cesarandClaude Opus 5
483da05a98
dataflow.yml is now the camera alone, so running it no longer pulls dora-hub over pip or needs a display. dataflow_plot.yml adds the viewer on image_bgr for when the stream should be looked at. dora 1.0 resolves an input's source only within the same descriptor, so the camera node is declared in both files rather than shared, and the two are run one at a time. CI validates both, which is what catches an output rename that breaks only the viewer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A65jaxrPXMN9EhBDMmMWb2
21 lines
599 B
YAML
21 lines
599 B
YAML
# The repository's own example: builds and runs the node from this checkout, so
|
|
# `dora validate` picks up the typed contract in dora-node.yml next to it.
|
|
# A consumer wires the node from a tag instead — see README.md.
|
|
#
|
|
# The camera alone, with no viewer and no Python dependency. For a run that
|
|
# also displays the stream, use dataflow_plot.yml.
|
|
strict_types: true
|
|
|
|
nodes:
|
|
- id: zed-camera
|
|
path: bin/dora_zed
|
|
build: scripts/build.sh
|
|
inputs:
|
|
tick: dora/timer/millis/100
|
|
outputs:
|
|
- image_bgr
|
|
- depth
|
|
- point_cloud
|
|
- camera_info
|
|
- camera_state
|