Nothing in a dataflow carries fx, fy, cx and cy except the camera, and every
pixel of a depth map needs them to become a 3D point. The node now accepts
them so whatever computes that next has them to hand.
They are read from two places because dora-zed publishes them twice: the
camera_info message, and the metadata of every frame. The per-frame copy is
not redundant -- camera_info goes out once per camera session, so a viewer
started after the camera would otherwise never see it, and reading frame
metadata means wiring the input is optional even for a camera that publishes
it.
A nine-element row-major K is accepted alongside the compact [fx, fy, cx, cy],
since that is how ROS spells the same model in sensor_msgs/CameraInfo.
The model is drawn under the caption rather than only stored. A depth map read
through the wrong intrinsics looks entirely plausible, and this is where that
becomes visible.
as_float32 moves to a payload module: camera_info arrives as a raw byte slice
for the same reason the depth map does, and the reinterpretation is now shared
rather than written twice.
Verified with dora-cli 1.0.1: validate passes with four contracts injected on
each side, the dataflow runs to a clean exit, and a composed frame was
rendered and inspected with the model drawn on it.
The node showed a colour image only, so debugging a depth pipeline meant
either trusting the numbers or writing a throwaway viewer. It now keeps one
panel per frame stream -- image and depth -- and tiles them side by side,
scaled to a common height. Wiring one is a plain viewer; wiring both shows
them together. bbox and text stay overlays rather than panels.
The contract follows what dora-zed already publishes: float32 [H, W] in
millimetres with 0 for missing. It is sent there as a raw byte slice, so the
payload arrives as UInt8 despite the Float32 contract and is reinterpreted
rather than converted.
Auto-ranging the colormap over the valid pixels' full extent, rather than over
a percentile of them, is deliberate and was not the first attempt: trimming
the tails collapsed on the scene the node exists for. A small object in front
of a large wall is a few percent of the pixels, so both tails landed on the
wall and the object clipped away. Rendering a frame and looking at it found
that; every test passed either way.
Verified with dora-cli 1.0.1: validate passes with both contracts injected,
the dataflow runs both nodes to a clean exit, and a composed frame was
rendered and inspected.
cristhian