4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
cristhian a6fa3ce32b accept std/media/v1/Image payloads
dora's typed image is an Arrow struct of width, height, encoding and data --
it carries inside the payload what this node has been reading out of message
metadata. The decoder now takes either shape: a struct describes itself and
its metadata is ignored, a flat UInt8 buffer is described by width/height/
encoding beside it, and everything after unpacking is common.

The declared contract stays std/core/v1/UInt8, deliberately. Type
compatibility is directional -- Image satisfies a Bytes input, but a
std/core/v1/UInt8 output wired into an std/media/v1/Image input is a validate
error -- and dora-zed declares image_bgr as std/core/v1/UInt8. Flipping this
manifest now would break the camera. Accepting both shapes first is what lets
the producers move before the contract does.

output_framing is not part of this. It selects the wire format, raw or
arrow-ipc, and is not required for images: a struct payload was verified to
arrive identically under both framings, and validate does not ask for
arrow-ipc when an output is annotated std/media/v1/Image. It earns its keep
when the wire must be self-describing, such as crossing languages or
recording.
2026-09-15 05:25:18 -03:00
cristhian 5a0f13d4db add camera_info input for the pinhole model
Nothing in a dataflow carries fx, fy, cx and cy except the camera, and every
pixel of a depth map needs them to become a 3D point. The node now accepts
them so whatever computes that next has them to hand.

They are read from two places because dora-zed publishes them twice: the
camera_info message, and the metadata of every frame. The per-frame copy is
not redundant -- camera_info goes out once per camera session, so a viewer
started after the camera would otherwise never see it, and reading frame
metadata means wiring the input is optional even for a camera that publishes
it.

A nine-element row-major K is accepted alongside the compact [fx, fy, cx, cy],
since that is how ROS spells the same model in sensor_msgs/CameraInfo.

The model is drawn under the caption rather than only stored. A depth map read
through the wrong intrinsics looks entirely plausible, and this is where that
becomes visible.

as_float32 moves to a payload module: camera_info arrives as a raw byte slice
for the same reason the depth map does, and the reinterpretation is now shared
rather than written twice.

Verified with dora-cli 1.0.1: validate passes with four contracts injected on
each side, the dataflow runs to a clean exit, and a composed frame was
rendered and inspected with the model drawn on it.
2026-09-15 05:09:07 -03:00
cristhian 0efeacd538 add a depth map panel
The node showed a colour image only, so debugging a depth pipeline meant
either trusting the numbers or writing a throwaway viewer. It now keeps one
panel per frame stream -- image and depth -- and tiles them side by side,
scaled to a common height. Wiring one is a plain viewer; wiring both shows
them together. bbox and text stay overlays rather than panels.

The contract follows what dora-zed already publishes: float32 [H, W] in
millimetres with 0 for missing. It is sent there as a raw byte slice, so the
payload arrives as UInt8 despite the Float32 contract and is reinterpreted
rather than converted.

Auto-ranging the colormap over the valid pixels' full extent, rather than over
a percentile of them, is deliberate and was not the first attempt: trimming
the tails collapsed on the scene the node exists for. A small object in front
of a large wall is a few percent of the pixels, so both tails landed on the
wall and the object clipped away. Rendering a frame and looking at it found
that; every test passed either way.

Verified with dora-cli 1.0.1: validate passes with both contracts injected,
the dataflow runs both nodes to a clean exit, and a composed frame was
rendered and inspected.
2026-09-15 05:06:50 -03:00
cristhian 00dc4c7b71 rename node to dora-image-view
The repository, the Python package, the entrypoint and the manifest name all
now agree. `plot` was carried over from the upstream opencv-plot node and no
longer described anything here, so the module, the class and the environment
variables follow the node:

  dora_plot/         -> dora_image_view/
  dora_plot/plot.py  -> dora_image_view/view.py
  Plot               -> View
  PLOT_WIDTH/HEIGHT  -> VIEW_WIDTH/HEIGHT
  --plot-width/-height -> --view-width/-height

Breaking for anyone wiring `path: dora-plot` or setting PLOT_WIDTH; nothing is
tagged yet.
2026-09-15 03:22:27 -03:00